But not necessarily for protection or sport. Syracuse professor Arthur Brooks points out a number of interesting correlations with gun ownership in the Wall Street Journal:
Who are all these gun owners? Are they the uneducated poor, left behind? It turns out they have the same level of formal education as nongun owners, on average. Furthermore, they earn 32% more per year than nonowners. Americans with guns are neither a small nor downtrodden group.
Nor are they “bitter.” In 2006, 36% of gun owners said they were “very happy,” while 9% were “not too happy.” Meanwhile, only 30% of people without guns were very happy, and 16% were not too happy.
In 1996, gun owners spent about 15% less of their time than nonowners feeling “outraged at something somebody had done.” It’s easy enough in certain precincts to caricature armed Americans as an angry and miserable fringe group. But it just isn’t true. The data say that the people in the approximately 40 million American households with guns are generally happier than those people in households that don’t have guns.
The gun-owning happiness gap exists on both sides of the political aisle. Gun-owning Republicans are more likely than nonowning Republicans to be very happy (46% to 37%). Democrats with guns are slightly likelier than Democrats without guns to be very happy as well (32% to 29%). Similarly, holding income constant, one still finds that gun owners are happiest.
Why are gun owners so happy? One plausible reason is a sense of self-reliance, in terms of self-defense or even in terms of the ability to hunt their own dinner.
Many studies over the years have shown that a belief in one’s control over the environment dramatically adds to happiness. Example: a famous study of elderly nursing home patients in the 1970s. It showed dramatic improvements in life satisfaction from elements of control as seemingly insignificant as being able to care for one’s plants.
But wait! There’s more! Gun owners also appear to be all-around better people than non-owners:
In 2002, they were more likely to give money to charity than people without guns (83% to 75%). This charity gap doesn’t reflect their somewhat higher incomes. Gun owners were also more likely to give in other ways, such as donating blood. Are gun owners unsentimental? In 2004, they were more likely than those without guns to strongly agree that they would “endure all things” for the one they loved (45% to 37%).
I don’t find any of this surrprising because while I do not currently own a gun, I grew up around lots of them, so I’ve always been far more perplexed by people who think of gun owners as somehow deviant. Of course, none of these correlations show that guns cause all these external benefits, but they certainly don’t seem to hurt.
Link from Marginal Revolution.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
StudLife is now at your fingertips 24/7 - Political news, commentary from Wash. U.’s own pundits and more
| Artist: | The Cure |
| Track: | Close to Me |
| Album: | Head on the Door |
RSS 2.0
